July 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in June, 2011: 10,973.
Total signals delivered year to date: 70,935
New single-account option is now available! $22.90 per month, see the solutions page for details.
June 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in May, 2011: 8,606.
Total signals delivered year to date: 59,962.
New single-account option enters beta-testing! We host the platform on our own servers to reduce overall server costs. We have developed a web-based control panel used for adjusting risk settings and enabling/disabling trading.
May 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in April, 2011: 15,370.
Total signals delivered year to date: 51,335.
No other news to report this month! Everything is running smoothly.
April 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in March, 2011: 15,069.
Total signals delivered year to date: 35,985.
No other news to report this month! Everything is running smoothly.
March 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in February, 2011: 9,857.
Total signals delivered year to date: 20,916.
No other news to report this month! Everything is running smoothly.
February 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in January, 2011: 11,059.
Total signals delivered year to date: 11,059.
No other news to report this month! Everything is running smoothly.
January 1st, 2011
Total signals delivered in December, 2011: 10,183.
Total signals delivered in 2010: 138,458.
As of January 1st, we have updated our VPS infrastructure to a new system. Instead of using Virtuozzo and Windows Server 2003 which has been buggy and unreliable at best (brief outages every 3-4 months), we have moved to a Xen virtualization system using Windows XP Professional VPS accounts. The result is a more reliable system with fewer VPS accounts per hardware node.
We also moved to a new datacenter in Washington, D.C. to be closer to the financial hub in New York. Our previous datacenter was in Atlanta, Georgia.
*A "signal delivered" is a unique signal that we have captured from the Signal Provider's account. It is not the total count of end users who received that signal. That number would be far greater.
|
Knowledgebase